What took place in Watertown was a general search, the police had no 'reasonable suspicion' that the suspect was in any particular house, nor did they have probable cause that he was in anyparticular house. Now that things have calmed down a bit, it would seem like a good opportunity to discuss this.
Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Article XIV: Every subject has a right to be
secure from all unreasonable searches, and seizures, of his person, his
houses, his papers, and all his possessions. All warrants, therefore,
are contrary to this right, if the cause or foundation of them be not
previously supported by oath or affirmation; and if the order in the
warrant to a civil officer, to make search in suspected places, or to
arrest one or more suspected persons, or to seize their property, be not
accompanied with a special designation of the persons or objects of
search, arrest, or seizure: and no warrant ought to be issued but in
cases, and with the formalities prescribed by the laws.
Constitution of the United States, Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
“Out started six officers, seized my bridle, put their
pistols to my breast, ordered me to dismount, which I did. One of them,
who appeared to have the command there, and much of a gentleman, asked
me where I came from; I told him. He asked what time I left . I told
him, he seemed surprised, said ''Sir, may I crave your name?'' I
answered ''My name is Revere.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Fire away, but as a courtesy to others please stay on-topic and refrain from gratuitous flaming. Don't feed the trolls!
Have a Blessed and Happy Christmas!
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.