Stalwart conservative Jonah Goldberg points out that this action is authorized by congress, and furthers our goals of assisting South Sudan and Uganda. It is not a matter of vital national security, but rather a case of us providing military assistance to friendly nations who have requested our help. We already have USAID and Peace Corps people on the ground providing medical, humanitarian and economic assistance.
For a less rosy view, see Gene Healy's Reason article, Obama's Latest Military Adventure.
I don't criticize Obama's "Leading from Behind" baloney...
I think he stumbled upon it after dithering and flailing about, and I don't like the formulation, but the US and the rest of the world could use more of it. Regardless of where you come down on the Libya questions, it was refreshing to see other countries take a leading role in the Kadhaffi beatdown.
I'm neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the wisdom of the Libyan operation, but just saying that if the situation arises, I'd like to see more like that and less like Afghanistan. Libya worked where Afghanistan has not for a host of complex reasons, but one simple fact is that the Libyans wanted it and they took matters into their own hands. John Barry writes about all this in his Daily Beast article, America’s Secret Libya War.
National Security First
Ron Paul famously stated that he would not have pulled the trigger on Bin Laden, and he stands on a firm, non-interventionist principle when he says it. But the fact that it makes lefties stand up and cheer gives me pause. You should never tell your enemies exactly what you will or won’t do. Keep ‘em guessing. As for principles, it’s a very unprincipled world out there. The constitutional principle of national defense comes first. Take your stand on any other and you could end up making it upon a pile of rubble.
Military Assistance: Helping those who help themselves
While I'm against any further large-scale land invasions, I am for small-scale military assistance operations, if legally authorized and diligently overseen. We've conducted thousands since the end of World War 2, but only a few ended up in larger conflagrations.
Military assistance builds goodwill with other nations, allows us to collect intelligence, and provides an opportunity for our soldiers to build professional relationships with fellow warriors in other countries.
Central America benefited from this in the 1980's, resulting in defeated Marxist rebels throwing down their arms and forming political parties. Our pre-9/11 forays into the Stans laid the groundwork for the blitzkreig toppling of the Taliban by the Norther Alliance partnered with our Special Forces. The Philippines have almost rolled up Abu Sayyaf thanks to their hard soldiering backed up by our non-combatant assistance.
Meanwhile, we continue to kill terrorists in Yemen and Pakistan from the air, although it is unclear whether this is furthering US national security goals.
We cannot completely retreat from the world, since its problems now routinely wash up on our shores. Helping friendly countries help themselves may not be vital to our national security, but done properly, it can further our national interests.
See Also:
Kevin Drum - Should US Troops be in Uganda?
See Also:
Kevin Drum - Should US Troops be in Uganda?