Sunday, October 30, 2016

Damned if you do, Damned if you don't


On one hand he could be accused of attempting to influence the election by his release of information regarding newly discovered Clinton emails, on the other hand he could be accused of attempting to influence the election by covering up information regarding newly discovered Clinton emails. It is a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation, certainly a situation none of us would want to be put in.  The question is... did he make the right decision?  First some assumptions:

1. There are a large number of emails, some reports state tens of thousands.  If it were a small number they would already know what is in them and this would (should) be a non-issue.

2. They do not know the contents of all the emails. (See 1. above).

Given those two conditions, in his place, what would you do and why?





   

No comments: